Think TV

Visit our store and try our
bestselling products!

Magnesium cream for
pain, iodine for energy,
eye-friendly LED bulbs,
best bath and body soaps ever!

How aware are you of chemtrails?

Environmental Health Trust et al v. FCC is a historic case aimed at getting the FCC to reconsider, revise, and update its 24-year old exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from cellphones, cell towers, Wi-Fi networks, smart meters, and other wireless communication devices and facilities.

EHS says:  We had our day in court. The truth was on our side and the federal judges asked excellent questions indicating that they read the scientific and policy evidence that EHT has submitted to the FCC over the last decade, much of which is now being used as key evidence in this historic case. "I’m just going to be very upfront with why I am inclined to rule against you," stated Honorable Judge Robert L. Wilkins (a chemical engineer by training) in his questions to FCC counsel Ashley S. Boizelle as he questioned the process by which the FCC and FDA had determined safety.